In Booker T. Washington’s Up From Slavery, Washington seems to be very optimistic, showing that he believes that with an emphasis on education and hard work the formerly enslaved black race in America will show their worth and gain more acceptance, “No race that has anything to contribute to the markets of the world is long in any degree ostracized.” (Washington, p. 444) W.E.B Du Bois makes it clear that he thinks that Washington has some important points, but Du Bois seems to be saying that much of what Washington suggests isn’t exactly practical and that instead of just showing worth and having a willingness to compromise, demands must be made because those that are oppressed can only rise as high as those with the power will let them:
"The question then comes: Is it possible, and probable, that nine millions of men can make effective progress in economic lines if they are deprived of political rights, made a servile caste, and allowed only the most meagre chance for developing their exceptional men? If history and reason give any distinct answer to these questions, it is an emphatic No." (Du Bois, p. 466)I find myself siding more with W.E.B Du Bois and it’s hard for me to classify Du Bois as being “militant” because I tend to think of a militant person as someone so adamant in their beliefs that it can sometimes border on the unreasonable, and I don’t think anything that Dubois had to say or suggest seemed or had the potential to be unreasonable in the least.
Wonderful post. I really like how you're able to find a connection to King too. He also said (in the Letter, I think) that the arch of history is long but bends toward justice, which seems to be a very Washingtonian idea.
ReplyDeleteIt's interesting to look at the influence both men have had (and continue to have) on the "race question" during the CR movement and beyond.